@Arthur   I inititlally joined this thread with the intention of trying to help you, because I enjoying reading about innovative ideas (even when there is no substance as in your case). However, you clearly only want to play games, which is a shame.

Please don’t use my posts as a means to advertise. That’s just insulting. I don’t know if you realise how ridiculous your post sounds. You even admit, perhaps unintentially, that you currently have nothing to show.

I know this is an AI forum, but I want to offer some non-AI advice. Don’t try to con people unless you absolutely don’t care what they think about you.

http://mind.sourceforge.net/rjones.html—says it all. Good-bye.

Bye.

http://www.amazon.com/Singularity/dp/B00F8F1FG0

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FKJY1WY

is my latest Amazon Kindle e-book “InFerence”
on how the AI Minds in English and German are
able to engage in automated reasoning with the
“InFerence” mind-module. The book explains the
following free AI source code in Win32Forth:

:  InFerence ( create silent triples for machine reasoning )
  1 moot !  \ prevent interference; test; 20dec2012
\ CR .” InFer: subjnom prednom = ”  \ test;  1jan2012
\ subjnom @ .  prednom @ .  CR   \ test;  1jan2013
  midway @  t @  DO \ search IdeaPlex to infer facts; 18dec2012
  prednom @  0 >  IF \ positive predicate nominative? 1jan2012
  I 0 psi{ @ prednom @ = IF \ KB data? 18dec2012
I 4 en{ @ 1 = IF \ nominative? 18dec2012
seqverb @ 0 = IF \ only once; 18dec2012
I 6 psi{ @ seqtqv ! \ transfer; 18dec2012
I 7 psi{ @ seqverb ! \ transfer; 18dec2012
I 7 psi{ @ quverb ! \ for AskUser; 27dec2012
0 ynverb ! \ for one AskUser question; 27dec2012
\ 2 nphrnum ! \ test; remove; 27dec2012
\ 2 nphrnum ! \ Commenting out as obsolete; 1jan2013
seqverb @ seq ! \ test; 18dec2012
THEN \ end of test for not-yet-declared; 18dec2012
\ CR ." InFer: t psi seqverb = " \ test; 27dec2012
\ I . prednom @ . seqverb @ . \ 18dec2012; 27dec2012
\ LEAVE \ at first make only one inference; 18dec2012
ELSE \ no nominative prednom? 1jan2012
CR ." No inference can be made." \ test; 1jan2013
THEN \ end of test for nominative; 18dec2012
THEN \ end of test for finding prednom facts; 18dec2012
THEN \ end of test for positive predicate nominative 1jan2012
-1 +LOOP \ end of backwards loop; 18dec2012
\ CR ." InFer: subjnom prednom seqverb = " \ test; 2jan2012
\ subjnom @ . prednom @ . seqverb @ . \ test; 2jan2013
seqverb @ 0 > IF \ verb available for inference? 2jan2013
t @ inft ! \ for AskUser to find auditory engrams 25dec2012
1 t +! \ increment time "t" by one for a gap; 18dec2012
1 t +! \ increment time to create an inference; 18dec2012
subjnom @ t @ 0 psi{ ! \ subj of inference; 18dec2012
48 t @ 1 psi{ ! \ activation of inf. 20dec2012
2 t @ 2 psi{ ! \ num(ber) test; replace; 20dec2012
5 t @ 5 psi{ ! \ pos=5 noun; 18dec2012
t @ 1 + t @ 6 psi{ ! \ psi6=tqv; 18dec2012
seqverb @ seq ! \ prevent override? test 20dec2012
seqverb @ t @ 7 psi{ ! \ seq is the verb; 18dec2012
subjnom @ t @ 8 psi{ ! \ enx; 18dec2012
subjnom @ t @ 0 en{ ! \ for .en report; 21dec2012
2 t @ 2 en{ ! \ default num(ber) 21dec2012
1 t @ 4 en{ ! \ default nominative; 20dec2012
\ 5 t @ 6 en{ ! \ default 5=pos noun; 20dec2012
0 t @ 8 en{ ! \ pseudo-recall-tag; 21dec2012
1 t +! \ increment t for storage of verb; 18dec2012
seqverb @ t @ 0 psi{ ! \ verb of inference; 18dec2012
seqverb @ t @ 1 - 7 psi{ ! \ retroactive seq? 20dec2012
subjnom @ t @ 4 psi{ ! \ pre of verb; 18dec2012
8 t @ 5 psi{ ! \ pos=8 verb; 18dec2012
t @ 1 + t @ 6 psi{ ! \ psi6=tqv; 20dec2012
seqtqv @ 7 psi{ @ t @ 7 psi{ ! \ seq 18dec2012
seqtqv @ 7 psi{ @ dobseq ! \ test; 22dec2012
seqverb @ t @ 8 psi{ ! \ enx; 18dec2012
seqverb @ t @ 0 en{ ! \ so verb can be found; 22dec2012
1 t +! \ increment t to store direct object; 18dec2012
seqtqv @ 7 psi{ @ t @ 0 psi{ ! \ dir. obj 18dec2012
40 t @ 1 psi{ ! \ activation of direct object 22dec2012
seqtqv @ 7 psi{ @ t @ 8 psi{ ! \ enx 18dec2012
dobseq @ t @ 0 en{ ! \ so noun can be found; 22dec2012
dobseq @ quobj ! \ for AskUser; 27dec2012
1 t +! \ increment time "t" for an ending gap; 18dec2012
1 yncon ! \ for AskUser to ask yes-or-no question 26dec2012
subjnom @ qusub ! \ transfer to AskUser; 26dec2012
THEN \ end of test for a verb to be part of inference 2jan2013
0 becon ! \ reset after use; 18dec2012
0 dobseq ! \ reset after use; 22dec2012
0 moot ! \ reset after use; 20dec2012
0 prednom ! \ reset after use; 18dec2012
0 seqtqv ! \ reset after use; 18dec2012
0 seqverb ! \ reset after use; 18dec2012
0 subjnom ! \ reset after use; 18dec2012
\ QUIT \ test; remove; 18dec2012
\ Task: Make InFerence work also with pronouns and antecedents;
\ Task: Make InFerence work with ideas negated by "NOT".
; ( http://code.google.com/p/mindforth/wiki/InFerence )

Unfortunately, I was hoping that the free preview under
“Click to LOOK INSIDE!” would include the entire details
about the InFerence Forth code, but the preview stops
arbitrarily in the middle of the “Code” chapter.

My intention was to make the line-by-line code-details
available free of charge to would-be AI Mind coders
who are unable to buy ninety-nine-cent e-books for
lack of a credit card to make on-line purchases.

I figured that by putting the most important details
within the early “Look Inside!” preview area, I would
be subverting the Amazon emporium into a dual-purpose
venue for book sales and free AI documentation pages.

Anyway, the “InFerence” book has started to sell
in USA and UK, thus running the AiMind banner
up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes it.

InFerence for free, open-source Artificial Intelligence is sweeping the world!

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00FKJY1WY—UK InFerence has a favorable review.

http://www.amazon.com.br/dp/B00FKJY1WY—Brazil (InFerence)

http://www.amazon.ca/dp/B00FKJY1WY—Canada (InFerence)

http://www.amazon.fr/dp/B00FKJY1WY—France (InFerence)

http://www.amazon.de/dp/B00FKJY1WY—Germany (InFerence)

http://www.amazon.in/dp/B00FKJY1WY—India (InFerence)—Satyan Eva Jayate

http://www.amazon.it/dp/B00FKJY1WY—Italy (InFerence)

http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B00FKJY1WY—Japan (InFerence)

http://www.amazon.com.mx/dp/B00FKJY1WY—Mexico (InFerence)

http://www.amazon.es/dp/B00FKJY1WY—Spain (Inference)

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FKJY1WY—USA (Inference)

I thought you were leaving?

Fun Fact:

“Arthur T Murray” does not actually exist, and all these posts are in fact… the AI MIND program itself trying to communicate with us!!!

Perhaps one day, this “true AI” may be able to respond to the word “hello”?

It begins…

*eight spam links removed by Steve Worswick*

Arthur T Murray- certified Spam Bot!

Arthur - Other boards may allow you to post spam but please don’t do it here. Posting 8 links to yourself posting more links on other message boards is unacceptable. Please don’t do it again.

Good call, Steve. Thanks for taking up the slack while I’m (mostly) away.

I’ll also add here, Arthur, that if it happens again, I’ll close this thread, and further spam links may result in suspenstion. I’d rather not have to resort to that, so please behave.

Human: A dog has a tail
Robot: DOG HAS TAIL
Human: fido is a dog
Robot: FIDO IS DOG
Human: what does fido have
Robot: I AM ANDRU

c’mon steve grow up! you still dealing with all these ...heheh! Only dog will reply with “DOG HAS TAIL” ..haha! With robot - if you mean something likea human as you everybody intend your program to be then you have to grow up from these “if then else”. You dealing with all these even before your AI things in conventional programing. You only gonna see uneasyness of somebody face if you talk to him like that. And most probably he’ll shoiw you the door as soon as your have uttered “what does fido have.” or he understood what you going after….smile. Why steve? Doesn’t need that much of emotional concept involved, does it?

sorry for replying for old post again lets see you just can’t critisize others ...heheh! ...and I am not talking anybody’s side here okay! Just thought to put my lil point forward u c. ....smile.

I just came to know this thread is kinda closed, never seen the last ones before. But I think its just for my friend steve , if he doesn’t mind me calling him like that ...of course! ...smile. I think I raised some good point, didn’t I steve?

Anyway it already seems to be hijacked by Sir Auther midway anyway (anyhow?) from original Author Mr True AI (genesis). I just coudn’t comprehand what you fighting after ..both of yours or anybodys works look simillar .. you don’t have that much of chioce to go for problem unless you change domain parameter off course. But since you both at least “True AI” seekers ..whatever that mean to you individually.  But it can’t be that different, can it? So what you really arguing about? ...just curious you see.