Don Patrick - Sep 29, 2013:
A danger in making anti-spam solutions public is that spammers can read them as well, and once a measure gains enough popularity they will just countermeasure the posted countermeasures.
We should therefore hide under the bed and hope they just leave us alone?
I think it’s better to let them know they can’t get away with it, and that future attempts will be dealt with in a similar way. Eventually they’ll give up, and another person will take their place.
You have to weigh the advantage gained by supporting botmasters who come to a forum like this looking for help against alerting a possibly disruptive person who trolls forums like this intent on finding a countermeasure for each solution. What are the odds? Might they still try countering these solutions when they find there methods no longer work even without knowing the solutions? I have people coming up with creative spellings for words my bots reject. What can I do but block the new word and move on until they come up with a new spelling.
Come to the AI Nexus Forum, and someone will answer your questions in the open for all to see, or in private, if you request.
By the way, I wouldn’t label the issues listed in the original post that started this thread as “spamming” a bot. I’d call it mischief or disruptions. It’s usually children unattended at the computer, however, I have two people who visit my bots regularly and admit to being adults and crazy.