|
|
Administrator
Total posts: 3111
Joined: Jun 14, 2010
|
This may seem either a little petty, or unimportant to some, but I find myself having difficulty with two LPP (Loebner Prize Protocol). When discussing the Loebner competition with regard to the protocol(s) being used it can get to be confusing at times. I have a potential solution to this that I would like to share. Let’s continue calling the old protocol the LPP, but let’s call the new one the NLP (New Loebner Protocol). I think that the acronym fits, still honors the memory of Hugh (we miss you, sir!), and provides an easy way to differentiate between the two. Feedback, opinions, questions and concerns are all welcome. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 25, 2017 |
[ # 1 ]
|
|
Guru
Total posts: 1009
Joined: Jun 13, 2013
|
I have to say this: NLP means “Natural Language Processing” to anyone who works in AI.
I just call the new interface “the interface”.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 25, 2017 |
[ # 2 ]
|
|
Guru
Total posts: 2372
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 25, 2017 |
[ # 3 ]
|
|
Administrator
Total posts: 3111
Joined: Jun 14, 2010
|
@Don: good point. My brain was screaming about some sort of conflict with that acronym, but darned if I could remember what.
@Bruce: I like that. It works for me. {insert favorite thumbs up emoji here}
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 25, 2017 |
[ # 4 ]
|
|
Senior member
Total posts: 179
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 25, 2017 |
[ # 5 ]
|
|
Mush Nine (#2)
Member
Total posts: 9
Joined: Aug 22, 2017
|
How about RLP (Revised Loebner Protocol). I personally like PLP (Prized Loebner Protocol) - it’s valued for sure
But if not, I also support LPP2.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 25, 2017 |
[ # 6 ]
|
|
Guru
Total posts: 1297
Joined: Nov 3, 2009
|
There is no need to rename the Loebner Prize Protocol (LPP).
Simply refer to the LPP by one of its modes: Character-mode or message-mode.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 26, 2017 |
[ # 7 ]
|
|
Administrator
Total posts: 3111
Joined: Jun 14, 2010
|
Still too confusing, Tom. I think I’ll just go with LPP2. If that suits others, great! if not, well I won’t complain (out loud).
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 26, 2017 |
[ # 8 ]
|
|
Senior member
Total posts: 206
Joined: Jul 1, 2009
|
Old protocol:
Character-mode, File-system based, Perl program
CRAMPER - ChaRActer-Mode PErl pRogram
New protocol:
Message-mode, Sockets.IO, REST, Node.js
REMISSION - REstMessage-mode SocketS.iO Node.js
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 28, 2017 |
[ # 9 ]
|
|
Administrator
Total posts: 3111
Joined: Jun 14, 2010
|
That sounds vaguely intestinal in nature, not to mention potentially painful, but at least the two acronyms are quite distinct from one another.
BTW, Rich, it’s been quite a while since we chatted. Perhaps we should arrange a Skype call at some future point? I think it would be good to catch up.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 28, 2017 |
[ # 10 ]
|
|
Experienced member
Total posts: 94
Joined: Jun 13, 2013
|
I suggest LPP v2, that is what I called it for Uberbot.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 31, 2017 |
[ # 11 ]
|
|
Guru
Total posts: 1297
Joined: Nov 3, 2009
|
See that Dave?
A Computer Science PhD seems to have felt my influence.
Go with Message-mode and Character-mode, friend.
Be more Computer Sciencey. ( Pronounced: /ˈsīənsē/ )
|
|
|
|