|
|
Member
Total posts: 13
Joined: Jun 13, 2013
|
What do you think about place your sources into github repo?
I think community can help you to improve your code.
Make more fast bugfix, fork, etc.
If you need help with git wellcome!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 1 ]
|
|
Member
Total posts: 21
Joined: Oct 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 2 ]
|
|
Moderator
Total posts: 2372
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
|
Not sold on doing that yet. I am not interested in forked versions and I don’t think bugfixes will be faster. The community currently has complete access to the source if they want to suggest improvements to code.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 3 ]
|
|
Member
Total posts: 21
Joined: Oct 25, 2011
|
You can do it just for fun. And see.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 4 ]
|
|
Moderator
Total posts: 2372
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
|
Since all the data is there, YOU can do it for fun. For me it would not be fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 5 ]
|
|
Member
Total posts: 21
Joined: Oct 25, 2011
|
I create the repo with last sources v3.6
https://github.com/vinnitu/chatscript
Please give me your public key and I will give you full access to repo.
And you can push changes (if you want of cause).
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 6 ]
|
|
Moderator
Total posts: 2372
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
|
We should switch to private emails now… Send me an email and since I don’t have a public key at present, point me to how you want me to create one.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 7 ]
|
|
Administrator
Total posts: 3111
Joined: Jun 14, 2010
|
As I already have an active presence on GitHub, and am currently involved with ChatScript (however minimally), I’ve had the ability to create a repo there at any time I so chose, and yet I did not. The primary reason for this was the fact that creating a repo there had already been discussed, and since Bruce indicated an unwillingness to maintain ChatScript at two separate venues at the time, I felt it best to respect his choice. I also happen to agree with the reasoning. GitHub is a great place to keep open source repositories for projects such as ChatScript, but so is SourceForge, and maintaining a “war on two fronts”, so to speak, is tedious.
Just thought I’d chime in here.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 8 ]
|
|
Moderator
Total posts: 2372
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
|
Indeed. thanks. I have no objection to having the sources in two places, but I have no interest in maintaining it in both. If Victor wants to mirrors sourceforge contents to github, I have no issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 9 ]
|
|
Member
Total posts: 21
Joined: Oct 25, 2011
|
I respect your opinion both.
But on sourceforge has not any svn repo. Just files to download.
Of Course you can use sf svn! But use!
PS: i prefer git to svn
PSS: if i can help with svn - no problem!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Aug 30, 2013 |
[ # 10 ]
|
|
Moderator
Total posts: 2372
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
|
So, since I’m not giving write access, what do you get from SVN that is not available at present in Sforge?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sep 2, 2013 |
[ # 11 ]
|
|
Member
Total posts: 21
Joined: Oct 25, 2011
|
diff at least
and more usable development process for you ofcause
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sep 2, 2013 |
[ # 12 ]
|
|
Senior member
Total posts: 623
Joined: Aug 24, 2010
|
Also interested in Bruce’s question, but I experienced a parsing error on the post above^. Care to elaborate?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sep 2, 2013 |
[ # 13 ]
|
|
Moderator
Total posts: 2372
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
|
I don’t see a more usable development process for me (can’t say about all the users, just for me).
I always want a zip archive of every release I make, and I usually daily make a dated zip archive of the system. So I’m already zipping everything. Putting up the zip with doc changes, version file, etc, is easy. Anything else is just an extra step.
|
|
|
|